Skip to content
HubSpot Solution Blueprint

Recovering Multi-Channel Attribution for a $50M+ Telehealth Clinic by Re-Engineering API Ingestion

Hero featured image

A flawed custom ERP sync destroyed marketing attribution for a telehealth provider, stamping 168,000 records with a generic "API" label. We re-engineered the API ingestion to parse granular source data before it hit the CRM. Native multi-channel reporting came back. 12% of the budget moved to high-performing campaigns.

Executive Summary

context-header-icon

Context

A high-volume telehealth clinic generated thousands of monthly leads. A poorly configured sync with its legacy ERP universally overwrote HubSpot's standard "Original Source" property with "API." Roughly 2/3 of the clinic's paid leads came from Facebook and 1/3 from Google, and the label turned all of them into unreportable filler.

what-we-built-header-icon

What We Built

We redesigned the integration point between the legacy ERP and HubSpot so attribution data gets custom-parsed at ingestion. A unified reporting framework then connected external ad performance directly to closed deals. Cross-channel velocity tracking became real.

tech-stack-header-icon

Tech Stack

  • HubSpot Reporting & Operations Hub Enterprise
  • Memo (Custom Legacy ERP)
  • Facebook Ads API / Google Ads API
  • Google Data Studio (Displaced)
  • BigQuery (Displaced)

Not a fit if your native integrations already map source data accurately, or if granular campaign ROI tracking isn't a commercial priority for your organization.

the-challenge-header-icon

The Challenge

The picture before the fix was functional blindness. The client spent heavily on Facebook and Google Ads, yet the HubSpot portal claimed nearly every lead came from "API." The custom integration with the legacy ERP was poorly structured: as data flowed into HubSpot, it overwrote the native "Original Source" property and genericized roughly 168,000 records.

Valid attribution data sat buried in raw contact activity objects instead of syncing to reportable properties. The system couldn't show which marketing channels drove revenue. That blindness pushed the marketing team into a defensive posture: manual data hygiene ate over 10 hours a week, and external reporting in Data Studio and BigQuery never aligned with the actual CRM data.

our-approach-header-icon

Our Approach

Fixing the reports was the wrong move. The data had to be fixed at the source, which meant the API ingestion point. We had a real choice: re-engineer the API data flow from the legacy ERP, or keep leaning on post-ingestion manual cleanup. We re-engineered the flow.

Custom properties went in, and the API endpoint payload mapping was redesigned. New logic intercepted the generic incoming data and parsed out the actual source, programmatically separating Facebook (which drove ~2/3 of paid leads), Google Search (1/3), and internal campaigns. We also standardized the use of HubSpot's Tracking URL parameters so web traffic mapped correctly to source reports. One more disconnect surfaced: HubSpot campaigns lacked attributed revenue because sales deal amounts were tracked inconsistently. We unified the revenue reporting framework, connecting ad spend directly to closed deal data. Cross-channel velocity was finally transparent, for the first time.

impact-header-icon

Impact

check-icon

12% Budget Reallocation to High-Performing Campaigns

Clean data infrastructure delivered real cross-channel velocity. Underperforming campaigns became easy to spot, and ad spend shifted to higher-ROI channels with confidence.

check-icon

Saving 10+ Hours Per Week on Manual Data Cleaning

The recursive cleanup ended. Fixing the data at the API ingestion point meant marketing operations no longer manually cleaned and reconciled data across external tools like BigQuery.

check-icon

Cross-Channel Velocity Transparency

External ad performance now connects directly to closed CRM deals. The reporting architecture covers the entire funnel, from impression to prescription.

check-icon

Displacement of Fractured Reporting Stacks

HubSpot's native reporting became usable again. The client dropped the disjointed Google Data Studio dashboards and centralized commercial intelligence inside the CRM.

Technical Blueprint
1

The redesigned integration endpoint accepts customized JSON payloads from the legacy ERP. The system programmatically parses source markers (e.g., 'fb_paid') within each payload and populates custom HubSpot attribution properties. Generic "API" labeling can't happen anymore.

2

We enforced rigid standardization for all inbound marketing links using HubSpot's Tracking URL Builder. Traffic from every source now maps accurately to HubSpot's native sources reports for proper segmentation.

3

Sales deal amounts had no connection to marketing assets. We bridged that gap with a unified reporting framework that forces the relationship between ad spend data and CRM deal amounts. Native campaign revenue attribution now works.

4

Operations Hub features format and validate data as it enters the portal via API. The cleansing is proactive. Standard and custom reporting properties get clean, standardized values before any automation or reporting logic touches them.

API data flow parsing generic ingestion data into specific Facebook and Google ad sources.

An API ingestion architecture designed to restore multi-channel attribution. By intercepting and parsing generic API payloads before they enter HubSpot, the system maps traffic to specific Facebook and Google source properties. This re-establishes native ROAS tracking and resolves attribution fragmentation.

FAQ

Can you fix marketing attribution in the BI layer instead of rebuilding it in the CRM?

Data Studio is a visualization layer. It can't fix data quality problems in the underlying CRM. The client had data in BigQuery, but it was disjointed from the CRM's operational reality. Fixing the data at the API ingestion point made HubSpot's native multi-channel reports usable again, and the commercial team started working from the same operational data as sales and clinical staff.

What happens if a lead source doesn't match a Tracking URL parameter?

A "fail-safe" sits inside the custom API payload parsing. When the integration can't confidently map incoming data to a specific paid source like Facebook or Google, it defaults the record to a cleaner "Offline Sync" category and flags it for operational review. Nothing gets buried under a generic "API" label.

footerCTA footerCTA-mobile
Spice up your inbox
Sign up for our newsletter
Don't worry - we only average, like, two emojis per subject line.